Is Angel Lola Love Gay

On the situation in Egypt

Attached Atilio Boron analysis and an interview with an Egyptian blogger on blogger and social processes that are currently living in Egypt and the hegemonic media hides (FCL)

On the prospects of popular struggle Egypt

What is happening in Egypt? Are we on the eve of a social revolution? It is possible, though there are signs that there is some form of organization behind the massive protests of those days. Although, must be recognized, often those forms are revealed suddenly in the vortex of revolutionary storm. Also do not forget that Mubarak's Egypt is the largest regional gendarme left for America in the Middle East apart from Israel, and that Washington will do everything possible to sustain it in power, or achieve a recamibio of names that do not change the nature of the regime. In other words, a "Mubarak" without Mubarak. With the probable fall of Mubarak, as the regime is dying, the strategic balance in the Middle East is extremely complicated for the United States because it can maintain its dominance without an ally in the region designed to contain protest and disrupt the world Arabic. With the "aircraft land" of Israel is not enough, for decades, Washington had Iran and Egypt. But in 1979 the Iranian revolution overthrew the despotic regime of the Shah, leaving in place a government that failed to submit the rule. By the same date, confirming that 1979 would be a fateful year for imperialism, the Sandinista revolution liquidated the regional gendarme of the empire in Central America: Nicaragua's Somoza. America has had to accommodate their chips in the Middle East Egypt because he had only to fulfill the role of regional watchdog (receiver of the second loan granted by the U.S. military, surpassed only by Israel receives) and now his client is about fall. For height of hypocrisy, Obama Hillary Clinton and now they ask Mubarak, after thirty years of unconditional support and complete complicity with his ferocious tyranny that respects human rights and democratic rules. "Before you had not noticed? Both are coming collapse of his pawn and try to" detach "an ally that no longer serves.
As support material and then reproduce a very interesting article published by Rebellion yesterday, January 29, 2011.

Interview with Hossam el-Hamalawy,
Egyptian journalist and blogger

Mark LeVine

Al-Jazeera

(Translated from English to Rebellion Germain by Leyens and reviewed by Caty R).

Hossam el-Hamalawy is a journalist and blogger site 3arabawy . Mark LeVine, professor at the University of California Irvine, managed to contact via Skype Hossam to get a firsthand report on events taking place in Egypt.

Why it took a revolution in Tunisia to take the Egyptians to the streets in unprecedented numbers?

in Egypt say that Tunisia was more a catalyst than an instigator, because the objective conditions for an uprising there in Egypt and in recent years the revolt was in the air. By the way, we have two mini-intifada or "mini-Tunisia in 2008. The first was an uprising in April 2008 in Mahalla, followed by another in Borollos, in the north.

Revolutions do not just happen. We have mechanically one morning in Egypt because yesterday there was one in Tunisia. It is not possible to isolate the protests of the last four years of labor strikes in Egypt or international events like the al-Aqsa intifada and the invasion of Iraq by the U.S. The outbreak of the al-Aqsa intifada was especially important because in the eighties and nineties the street activism was effectively prevented by the government as part of the fight against Islamist insurgents. Only continued to exist on college campuses or party central. But the outbreak of the intifada in 2000 and al Jazeera began broadcasting images of her, inspired our youth to take to the streets, in the same way that inspires us today Tunisia.

How do you develop the protests?

is too early to say how they develop. It's a miracle to continue yesterday after Midnight in spite of fear and repression. But having said that, the situation has reached a level where everyone is sick, seriously sick. And even if the security forces manage to crush the protests today can not crush happen next week or next month or later this year. There's definitely a change in the degree of courage of the people. The state has helped the coalition against terrorism in the nineties to eliminate all forms of dissent in the country, a trick used by all governments, including the U.S. But once the formal opposition to a regime of weapons going into mass protests, it is very difficult to deal with a such dissent. You can plan the liquidation of a terrorist group fighting in the reeds, but what they will do in front of thousands of demonstrators in the streets? They can not kill them all. They can not even ensure that soldiers do, to shoot against the poor.

What is the relationship between regional and local events in this country?

have to understand that it is local regional in this country. In 2000, the protests started as protests against the regime but rather against Israel and in support of the Palestinians. What did the U.S. invasion of Iraq three years later. But once you go into the streets and confront the violence of a system begins to ask questions: Why Mubarak sent troops to confront the demonstrators rather than face Israel? Why exporting cement to Israel for use to build settlements in place to help the Palestinians? Why is so brutal police with us when we only try to express our solidarity with the Palestinians in a peaceful manner? And regional issues like Israel and Iraq became local issues. And in a few moments, the same protesters who chanted pro-Palestinian slogans against Mubarak started doing. The specific turning point in terms of protests was 2004, when dissent became interior.

In Tunisia, the unions played a crucial role in the revolution, as its comprehensive and disciplined membership said that the protests could not be crushed easily and gave an organization. What is the role of the labor movement in Egypt in the current uprising?

Egyptian trade union movement was fairly attacked in the eighties and nineties by police who used live ammunition against peaceful strikers in 1989 during strikes in the mills and in 1994 in the strikes in the factories textiles. But since December 2006, our country is continuously higher and more sustained wave of strike action since 1946, triggered by strikes in the textile industry in the city of Mahalla in the Nile Delta, the center of the largest labor force in the Middle East more of 28,000 workers. Began due to work but was extended to all sectors of society with the exception of police and armed forces.

As a result of the strikes we have to get 2 independent unions, the first of its kind since 1957, collectors of property taxes, which includes more than 40,000 civil servants and technicians of health More than 30,000 of which launched a union last month outside the state-controlled unions.

But it is true that there is a difference between us and Tunisia, is that although it was a dictatorship, Tunisia had a semi-independent trade union federation. Even if the leadership collaborated with the regime, members were union members. So when it came time for general strikes, the unions were able to join. But here in Egypt we hope to fill a void that soon. For the independent union and have had witch hunts since he tried to settle, and proceedings are initiated against them by the state unions and backed by the state, but will continue to strengthen despite the continued attempts to silence them.

Indeed, in recent days has led the crackdown against protesters in the streets, which are not necessarily union. These protests have brought together a broad spectrum of Egyptian including sons and daughters of the elite. So we have a combination of poor urban youth with the middle class and the sons and daughters of the elite.

I think Mubarak has managed to bring together all sectors of society with the exception of his inner circle of accomplices.

Tunisian Revolution has been described as well-led "youth" and dependent for its success on the technology of social networks like Facebook and Twitter. And now people focus on youth in Egypt as an important catalyst. "This is a "Intifada youth" and could take place without Facebook and other new media technologies?

Yes, it is an intifada youth on the street. Internet only plays a role in spreading the word and images of what happens on the ground. Do not use the Internet to organize. We use it to make known what we are doing on the ground in the hope of encouraging others to participate in the action.

As you may have heard, in the U.S., talk show host Glenn Beck has attacked an elderly academic, Frances Fox Piven, for an article she wrote calling for the unemployed to carry out massive protests jobs . He has even received death threats, some people without work who seems happier fantasizing about shooting one of his many weapons that really fight for their rights. It's amazing to think about the crucial role of trade unions in the Arab world today, taking into account more than two decades of neoliberal regimes throughout the region whose primary objective is to destroy the solidarity of the working class. Why have remained as major trade unions?

unions are always the magic bullet against any dictatorship. Look at Poland, South Korea, Latin America and Tunisia. The unions have always been useful for the mobilization of the masses. We need a general strike to overthrow a dictatorship, and there is nothing better than an independent union to do so.

Is there a broader ideological agenda behind the protests, or just get rid of Mubarak?

Everyone has their reasons for leaving the streets, but I suppose if our survey is successful and will toppled Mubarak divisions. The poor want to lead the revolution to a much more radical, promoting a radical redistribution of wealth and fight corruption, while the so-called reformists want to put the brakes, pressing more or less by changes "from above" and limit some powers but keep some essence of state.

What is the role of the Muslim Brotherhood and how it impacts the fact that the situation remains far from the current protests?

The Brotherhood has divisions suffered from the outbreak of the al-Aqsa intifada. Your participation in the Palestine Solidarity Movement when faced with the regime was disastrous. Basically, every time their leaders reach a compromise with the regime, especially the acolytes of the current supreme leader, demoralize their base tables. I personally know many young people brothers who left the group, some of them have joined other groups or are independent. As it grows, the current movement and the leadership street lower part, there will be more divisions because the top leadership can not justify why it is not part of the new survey.

What is the U.S. role in this conflict? How do you see people on the street their positions?

Mubarak is the second largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid after Israel. It is known as the U.S. bully in the region is one of the instruments of U.S. foreign policy, which implements the security program for Israel and oil flow smoothly while keeping out the Palestinians. So it's no secret that the dictatorship has received the support of U.S. government from the first day, even during pro-democracy rhetoric misleading Bush. So do not be surprised at the ridiculous statements about Clinton defended the Mubarak regime, as one of the pillars of U.S. foreign policy is to maintain stable regimes at the expense of freedom and civil rights.

not expect anything from Obama, whom we consider as a big hypocrite. But we hope that the American people, unions, teachers associations, student unions, activist groups - are pronounced in our support. What we want is that the U.S. government remains completely off topic. We do not want any kind of endorsement, simply cut aid to Mubarak immediately and remove the back, to withdraw from all bases in the Middle East and stop supporting the State of Israel.

Ultimately, Mubarak will do everything you need to do to protect themselves. Suddenly take the anti-American rhetoric if you think you can help to save his skin. After all is committed to its own interests and if you think U.S. not support it, will turn in another direction. The reality is that any really clean government comes to power in the region will open conflict with the U.S. because they call for a rational redistribution of wealth and to end support for Israel and other dictatorships. So do not expect any U.S. aid Just leave us alone.

Continue reading this article ...

Words Of Congratulations Appointment

PHOTO SEPIA SALUTE

By: Xavier Lasso (The Telegraph)

We may be at a key moment in our national events and it seems that the so-called opposition has not noticed that. The policy should be supported by ideas, concepts and solid arguments. None of that seems to characterize those who must fight legitimately, the current draft power.

ignorance How much can we afford? One assumes that the trend should be the minimum possible, but in the case of our political opposition burden can be immense. In their positions, well away from the criticism, it has not been following a good basis for discussion. It would appear that these years of globalization discourse, the much-boasted, has left emptied of contents.

This pass, which also coincides with the rise of neoliberalism, perhaps led them to believe that history had stopped. Were no longer needed and contrast ideas. Now it has taken by surprise by the strong support it receives Rafael Correa.

with platitudes rather media discourse, intended to fight this time full of movement. People

supposedly defending progressive ideas is now at the tail of an old concern: the sheer accumulation. From the outside, when it seemed that defending principles, it was absurd that a Andrés Páez will follow in the footsteps of a Fausto Cobo. The times of confusion are so great that those borders are erased. In this case, yes, populism and its most vulgar have been merged with the Social Democrats appeared in the region.

as a political analyst Cesar Montufar, supposedly ready to offer ideas under the umbrella of its formation, has been lost in senseless fights future that should never be subordinated to the personal future of politicians of looks restricted. Another one that hurts him to tail, to the same queue.

And as a general framework of this decline opposition now appears a painful picture, maybe I should not afford such a mix, it might be unfair to believe that Simon Espinoza, febrescorderismo much light in, have downloaded all your batteries. Hard to believe that now share the readings failed Osvaldo Hurtado, or always been like that?

That photo in sepia, as a reminder of the past, where everything seems mixed, lost, can never represent this huge contradiction that we must solve: what is the state, what is its role? If the exclusion has been the hallmark of so many years without the leadership of a strong state, it is clear that we must recover to abate such injustices.

The State cornered thing of the past, or the State that defines social policies that something corrected deviations of many personal desires, make this start that almost coincides with the start of a new century.

The photo is sepia shadow of the past. It is unfortunate that some faces appear as rendered, to try to uphold some symbols, as in the times of the compromises that do not correspond to this moment.

Continue reading this article ...

Natalie Morales 2010 Hairstyle

welcome the appointment as Interior Minister Alfredo Vera Arrata Companion, Guayaquil 75 years and an architect by profession, who collaborated on several occasions to its Articles original publication.


FEUE was vice president of Guayaquil, he worked as a journalist work in various publications and radio programs nationwide. Guayas deputy from 1986 to 1988, Minister of Education and promoter of the Literacy Campaign Monsignor Leonidas Proaño between 1988 and 1991, National Deputy in 1992 and one of the few Assembly members who at 98 is facing the bulldozer of Christian Socialists and Christian Democrats during the neoliberal Constitutional Assembly. Former Secretary Corruption in the government of Rafael Correa Delgado. Firm and supportive

always with the sister Republic of Cuba, often coordinating the activities of solidarity with the island and permanent promoter of culture through Guayasamín Foundation.

We hope that his political experience and his quality as a human being to achieve an optimal management of the new challenge to take on as Minister of the Interior.

(Fernando Cornejo León)

Continue reading this article ...

Do Electric Heaters Cause Sinus Infections

APPOINTMENT AS THE END OF THE TRUE MARKET RESPONSE

By: Dante Palma
(Piblicado originalmene in the Journal Veitirés)
Source: http://elinfiernodedanteblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/el-fin-del-mercado-como-verdad.html

Probably there has been no review of the years of Nestor Kirchner in power that would not do emphasized that his leadership marked the return and claim the policy on the economy. Hence, although I assume that the complexity of contemporary societies require to be more cautious and take into account a lot of nuances, it would be quite improper to take as variables the tension between economics and politics as the axis on which to explain, at least the difference between the prevailing trend in the 90 and the paradigm shift that spanned much of the first decade of the century.
If we interpret politics as circumscribed to actions that come from the Government, poor but useful definition for the purposes of this note, it is clear that the process of self-reduction of the state in pursuit of private interests and forces "harmonics" that govern the market, represents a cut of the possibilities of politics. Based on a modern conception of freedom, neo-liberals interpret that any state interference is harmful and detrimental to the pursuit of individual desires and ideals of the good life of each individual. Protection of private property over physical and legal security. No more than that. Everything else maximalism embodies the danger of state. Obviously, the implosion of 2001 was a change in economic policy but That does not necessarily imply a variation in the conception of the role that the State must meet for high exchange rate and hence the natural promotion of exports is not, in itself, synonymous with anti-liberal economic policy. But since 2003, the nationalization of some utilities, renegotiating debt, independently of the IMF, the FTAA Not generally a policy of outright opposition to the guidelines of the Washington Consensus, were changes visible that appeared as factual support what was, gradually and even with infinite number of flats, a process of cultural transformation that would reinstate a conception of State and society that says that policy should be determined to economics and not vice versa.
But what means this change? What depths acquired? In what field is being waged? The answer is difficult but to try an approach I borrow the philosopher Michel Foucault an idea of \u200b\u200bthe significance of the market for neoliberalism. At the risk
countless other inaccuracies, I would rebuild part of the argument that the French philosopher stated in his course at the College de France in the year 78-79 and was published in book form under the name The Birth of Biopolitics. For Foucault, the liberal tradition that proclaims by a minimal state stands on the market as the court of good governance. Thus, it is the economy that will determine the market politics is the thermometer to assess government actions. The market not only serves as a limit to the sovereignty of political power as the place where "should not go" but also that will determine whether the policy is "on the right track." Thus, Foucault asserts that the market went from being a place where it appears the "justice" to a place where it appears the "truth", ie that which was originally a market square where there was a regulation that allowed achieve a fair price for a product and which limited the possibilities of fraud, there is now a market where what appears is a "truth" that will give an account of what government actions are right and which wrong. And here we return to the Argentine case and ask ourselves are we not today witness of those tough neo-liberal forces in the opposition attempt to assert that the employer to assess what the government does is the market? Is it not said, finally, that since the market is the place of truth, the reaction of the operators of our "City" is what marks the pulse and allow us to determine if the government does well or wrong? Is not it suggests that if the government is not telling the truth about the numbers from INDEC, the entire policy, not just economic, it is a farce? Finally, the fact that economists, almost as a kind of postmodern mediums, are those that citizens and governments should listen to know the future of the country and to act on it, is not part of this trend of genuflection of politics with the economy?
It is from this idea that can shed light, for example, one of the central axis CFK exhibited at the last meeting of the G20 and that would be embedded in the tradition of true Peronism, as to profess economic independence. I am referring to criticism of the Rating Agencies. If they still exist, you will remember from the time of the Alliance when we show the "country risk" and the mainstream media amplified their diagnosis every 30 minutes next to the price of the dollar and the wind chill that always came in the form of "wave "whether heat is cold. The "Country risk" was never presented as the qualification that makes a particular company, interested in advising clients with significant capital. Rather it is presented as a truth, that you can quantify when a country is "risky." Furthermore, this notion of "risk", almost like a slippery slope, is not confined to the area of \u200b\u200bthe disadvantages that an economy can bring to a particular investor, but on a fast chain of signifiers, covers social, political and legal. Thus, governments in the region are making steps that are "verified" by the counter that adds or subtracts points depending on how much we get closer to what the market space that has ceased to be a fair exchange to become that of the true, desired.
This X-ray and diagnosis are used by Foucault as a chapter of his unfinished story of truth. For any reader distracted, we can say that such history is not the failures and errors of human civilization that eventually end up being desasnados by enlightened souls who are above the mediocrity of the time in which they live. It is, rather, a story of "veridiction" that is, the ways in which each historical context the powers that be decided what was true and what that truth will eventually manifest space. This idea could Foucault emphasized, then, seeks not to say that the return policy is that now the truth will be told by the State or government but simply that the truth is a land dispute and that there is "One Truth" but multiple perspectives. Return policy Kirchner's hand then it should stop teaching: it is not one truth that appeared in the guidelines of the ruling party or we can describe politics in terms of true or false or morally , good or bad. For this is Pino Solanas and Carrio, candidates for the position of heavenly creatures life. Rather, the return of the political means to challenge the narrative space to the market and the economy in general, failed to show a "real truth" objective would be to "politics" but to point out that behind this apparent aseptic space that is "the market" are squatting interests, neither true nor false, just interested.

Continue reading this article ...