By: Werner Von Schoettler Vásquez (The Telegraph)
"No votes or to meet the Vestry substitute," said a reader of the holder of a newspaper, those calling themselves the targets: "Huge attendance at the protest convened by .... " In a city of over two million people, they say, who attended "three thousand", which means that there were more than 0.10% of the population of the city. Another super headlines was: "Quiteños publicly expressed their distaste for ...." Between the idea of \u200b\u200bcrowds and Quito, one would think that was a call massive, overwhelming, consistent, proactive and a clear ideological and political agenda in the legitimate struggle for power. In the TV also the event was very well edited: camera approaches that contradicted the story of a journalist and then a single quick overview at the end of the story where the "mob" was confused with the dark of night ... However, there to assess small groups to mobilize "against" or "opposed to" or "because I hate", which shows that they are essentially reactive and suffer the same evil neoliberal thought of his pocket and without a hint of speech political. To everything happens because they have stopped receiving, because they pay taxes, because they are not the same people who govern, and families are not the most celebrated leading the "hacienda", but are others, just another ... but when the others are also the middle class considered traitors, sold, etc. One such
Internet media stated: "An unprecedented interactive public dialogue between citizens and political actors lived in the camp ...." It was unprecedented that almost a carbon copy of the screaming and choking their coidearios in Guayaquil, against tyranny and totalitarianism! If tyranny and totalitarianism exist in this country, precisely, could not be given such marches were political prisoners and disappeared as the time of the ineffable Febres Cordero. And how could it fail, the ego was ahead. The theme of the call was, "I summon, you are expressing." Presumably this will be the basis of what they propose as "real democracy" ... "the duty is to unite the Ecuadorians, free, independent, decent and democratic ...." We have lived these long decades of Ecuadorian decent and now offer "six outs" that are synthesized in wanting a new constitution. Yes, the mess remains central to the Constitution, it is not a simple document approved by a resounding majority, but one of the democratic instruments necessary for the transformation of this country. Recall that the elite did everything to discredit elaborated in Montecristi. It is clear that the system should accelerate change and among those let go of the reactionary and sisters in a block of power-with the indigenous movement-for the structural transformation project comes to fruition ... The bourgeois right, for now, is drowned in their profound mediocrity neoliberal think the pocket and not your head ... 
0 comments:
Post a Comment